Grocott's Mail
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Friday, December 5
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Grocott's Mail
    • NEWS
      • Courts & Crime
      • Features
      • Politics
      • People
      • Health & Well-being
    • SPORT
      • News
      • Results
      • Sports Diary
      • Club Contacts
      • Columns
      • Sport Galleries
      • Sport Videos
    • OPINION
      • Election Connection
      • Makana Voices
      • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
      • Newtown… Old Eyes
      • Incisive View
      • Your Say
    • CUE
      • Cue Archives
    • ARTSLIFE
      • Makana Sharp!
      • Visual Art
      • Literature
      • Food
      • Festivals
      • Community Arts
      • Going Places
    • OUR TOWN
      • What’s on
      • Spiritual
      • Emergency & Well-being
      • Covid-19
      • Safety
      • Civic
      • Municipality
      • Weather
      • Properties
        • Grahamstown Properties
      • Your Town, Our Town
    • OUTSIDE
      • Enviro News
      • Gardening
      • Farming
      • Science
      • Conservation
      • Motoring
      • Pets/Animals
    • ECONOMIX
      • Business News
      • Entrepreneurship
      • Personal Finance
    • EDUCATION
      • Education NEWS
      • Education OUR TOWN
      • Education INFO
    • EDITORIAL
    Grocott's Mail
    You are at:Home»NEWS»Response from the Office of the Public Protector
    NEWS

    Response from the Office of the Public Protector

    Karabo MatalajoeBy Karabo MatalajoeNovember 20, 2025Updated:November 21, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Nompilo Kholeka Gcaleka is a South African lawyer and the current Public Protector of South Africa. Photo: Supplied

    In terms of section 6(3)(b) of the Public Protector Act, 1994, the Public Protector may refuse to investigate a matter if the person ostensibly prejudiced has not taken all reasonable steps to exhaust his or her legal remedies in connection with such matter.

    In this instance, the Investigation Team was of the view that the complainant had not fully exhausted the internal remedies or channels that he could reasonably be expected to use prior to lodging a complaint with the Public Protector.

    The Public Protector is an institution of last resort, and each matter is considered on its own merits. Thus, declining a matter in terms of section 6(3)(b) does not prevent a complainant from returning to the Public Protector once they have exhausted their internal remedies.

    Previous ArticleAll systems go for Goldrush Fabin Juries fun day
    Next Article Payment dispute threatens Grahamstown Primary School project
    Karabo Matalajoe
    • Website

    Comments are closed.

    Latest publication
    Search Grocott’s pdf publications
    Code of Ethics and Conduct
    GROCOTT’S SUBSCRIPTION
    RMR
    Listen to RMR


    Humans of Makhanda

    Humans of Makhanda

    Weather    |     About     |     Advertise     |     Subscribe     |     Contact     |     Support Grocott’s Mail

    © 2025 Maintained by School of Journalism & Media Studies.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.