Grocott's Mail
  • NEWS
    • Courts & Crime
    • Features
    • Politics
    • People
    • Health & Well-being
  • SPORT
    • News
    • Results
    • Sports Diary
    • Club Contacts
    • Columns
    • Sport Galleries
    • Sport Videos
  • OPINION
    • Election Connection
    • Makana Voices
    • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
    • Newtown… Old Eyes
    • Incisive View
    • Your Say
  • ARTSLIFE
    • Cue
    • Makana Sharp!
    • Visual Art
    • Literature
    • Food & Fun
    • Festivals
    • Community Arts
    • Going Places
  • OUR TOWN
    • What’s on
    • Spiritual
    • Emergency & Well-being
    • Safety
    • Civic
    • Municipality
    • Weather
    • Properties
      • Grahamstown Properties
    • Your Town, Our Town
  • OUTSIDE
    • Enviro News
    • Gardening
    • Farming
    • Science
    • Conservation
    • Motoring
    • Pets/Animals
  • ECONOMIX
    • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Personal Finance
  • EDUCATION
    • Education NEWS
    • Education OUR TOWN
    • Education INFO
  • Covid-19
  • EDITORIAL
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • Halala, Ntsika!
  • What’s on – 26 January – 2 February
  • 2023 is off like a rocket at Holy Cross
  • An all-too-restrained explication of our immanent apocalypse
  • 135 pairs of shoes for Khutliso Daniels learners
  • Makhanda’s educational stars are aligning
  • Makana-Rini United (MARU) Club struggles on
  • Only three educators left at Riebeeck East Combined School
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Grocott's Mail
  • NEWS
    • Courts & Crime
    • Features
    • Politics
    • People
    • Health & Well-being
  • SPORT
    • News
    • Results
    • Sports Diary
    • Club Contacts
    • Columns
    • Sport Galleries
    • Sport Videos
  • OPINION
    • Election Connection
    • Makana Voices
    • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
    • Newtown… Old Eyes
    • Incisive View
    • Your Say
  • ARTSLIFE
    • Cue
    • Makana Sharp!
    • Visual Art
    • Literature
    • Food & Fun
    • Festivals
    • Community Arts
    • Going Places
  • OUR TOWN
    • What’s on
    • Spiritual
    • Emergency & Well-being
    • Safety
    • Civic
    • Municipality
    • Weather
    • Properties
      • Grahamstown Properties
    • Your Town, Our Town
  • OUTSIDE
    • Enviro News
    • Gardening
    • Farming
    • Science
    • Conservation
    • Motoring
    • Pets/Animals
  • ECONOMIX
    • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Personal Finance
  • EDUCATION
    • Education NEWS
    • Education OUR TOWN
    • Education INFO
  • Covid-19
  • EDITORIAL
Grocott's Mail
You are at:Home»NEWS»Courts & Crime»Rhodes vax mandate dismissals ruled unfair by CCMA
Courts & Crime

Rhodes vax mandate dismissals ruled unfair by CCMA

Rod AmnerBy Rod AmnerDecember 1, 2022Updated:December 1, 2022No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
The CCMA has found that Rhodes University failed to notify at least two of its employees of their constitutional right to refuse the vaccination on the ground of bodily integrity.

By ROD AMNER

The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) has ruled that Rhodes University’s dismissal of two employees for refusing to comply with its university’s Covid-19 vaccine mandate policy was “procedurally and substantively unfair”.

David Drennan, the former chief technical officer of the Rhodes Department of Zoology and Entomology, and Heidi Myburgh, a former secretary in the Rhodes Department of Computer Science, were awarded seven and nine months’ salary, respectively, as compensation.

CCMA Commissioner Francois du Toit ruled the dismissals were unfair because:

  • the university failed to notify the employees of their constitutional right to refuse the vaccination on the ground of bodily integrity;
  • failed to council the employees;
  • failed to take steps to reasonably accommodate the employees into positions which did not require vaccination;
  • the university’s exemption policy did not afford employees a reasonable alternative to mandatory compliance with its vaccination policy because it did not allow employees to apply for exemption on constitutional grounds relating to bodily integrity.
Makhanda Against Mandates loses interdict

In February 2022, an urgent Makhanda Against Mandates (MAM) application for an interdict against Rhodes University’s Covid-19 vaccine mandate was struck off the Makhanda High Court roll with costs.

MAM was an alliance of Rhodes University students, parents and employees, led by philosophy lecturer Francis Williamson, David Drennan and others, which applied to the High Court to review and set aside the vaccine mandate.

Former Rhodes Philosophy lecturer Francis Williamson was dismissed from the university over his opposition to the vaccination mandate.

High Court judge Murray Lowe ruled Rhodes had not been given enough time to respond to the application and struck MAM’s application from the roll. Lowe also said he was cognisant of “the chilling effect that an adverse costs order may have on Constitutional litigation” but ordered MAM to pay Rhodes’s “wasted costs”.

The Rhodes University Council approved the vaccination mandate in October 2021. Anyone who wished to access campus had to provide proof of vaccination or an exemption from vaccination issued by the University.

MAM wanted to prevent the university from refusing to register unvaccinated students or placing unvaccinated staff on unpaid or annual leave.

MAM believed that the university’s vaccine exemption policy – based on medical or religious grounds – was too narrow and that it was unreasonable to require exempted staff and students to take weekly Covid-19 tests at their own expense.

The recent CCMA ruling referred to the “employees’ constitutional right to refuse the vaccination on the ground of bodily integrity”.

The CCMA case

In his testimony to the CCMA, David Drennan said he had not been informed that he could refuse the vaccine on constitutional grounds, particularly bodily integrity.

Former Rhodes University chief technical officer David Drennan. https://www.safisheriesecologyresearchlab.com/people

The CCMA ruling appears to open the door for many more dismissed Rhodes staff to appeal for compensation.

In his testimony, Drennan confirmed that before his dismissal, he had not been consulted by Rhodes to try and accommodate him.

He said Rhodes had not consulted him about alternatives or adapting his duties. He had also not been consulted about a risk assessment.

He had also not been asked why he refused to vaccinate or offered any counselling.

Drennan explained that he had not applied for an exemption because he understood the application was based on medical or religious grounds. He had neither.

He testified that neither the head of the department nor his line manager contacted him – he had sent emails, but no one responded.

Myburgh and Drennan were represented by Mike van der Veen, a Wheeldon Rushmere and Cole attorney. Advocate Izak Smuts SC and Advocate Nicola Molony, instructed by Huxtable Attorneys, represented Rhodes University.

Rhodes University Communications said the university had received arbitration certificates late on Wednesday, 30 November, was consulting with its legal team “regarding a way forward,” and could not comment any further at this stage.

Previous ArticleWhat’s On 01 – 08 December
Next Article The leaves of the ‘Jeff Budaza tree’ will not dry up
Rod Amner

Comments are closed.

Tweets by Grocotts
Newsletter



Listen

The Rhodes University Community Engagement Division has launched Engagement in Action, a new podcast which aims to bring to life some of the many ways in which the University interacts with communities around it. Check it out below.

Humans of Makhanda

Humans of Makhanda

Weather    |     About     |     Advertise     |     Subscribe     |     Contact     |     Support Grocott’s Mail

© 2023 Maintained by School of Journalism & Media Studies.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.