Grocott's Mail
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Tuesday, June 17
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Grocott's Mail
    • NEWS
      • Courts & Crime
      • Features
      • Politics
      • People
      • Health & Well-being
    • SPORT
      • News
      • Results
      • Sports Diary
      • Club Contacts
      • Columns
      • Sport Galleries
      • Sport Videos
    • OPINION
      • Election Connection
      • Makana Voices
      • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
      • Newtown… Old Eyes
      • Incisive View
      • Your Say
    • ARTSLIFE
      • Cue
        • Cue Archives
      • Makana Sharp!
      • Visual Art
      • Literature
      • Food
      • Festivals
      • Community Arts
      • Going Places
    • OUR TOWN
      • What’s on
      • Spiritual
      • Emergency & Well-being
      • Covid-19
      • Safety
      • Civic
      • Municipality
      • Weather
      • Properties
        • Grahamstown Properties
      • Your Town, Our Town
    • OUTSIDE
      • Enviro News
      • Gardening
      • Farming
      • Science
      • Conservation
      • Motoring
      • Pets/Animals
    • ECONOMIX
      • Business News
      • Entrepreneurship
      • Personal Finance
    • EDUCATION
      • Education NEWS
      • Education OUR TOWN
      • Education INFO
    • EDITORIAL
    Grocott's Mail
    You are at:Home»NEWS»Cell tower planner faces residents
    NEWS

    Cell tower planner faces residents

    Sue MaclennanBy Sue MaclennanJuly 12, 2019Updated:November 12, 2019No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Daniel Beukes (left) of Port Elizabeth-based BJB Project Services answers questions about the proposed Market Street cellphone tower at a public meeting on Tuesday 9 July 2019. Photo: Sue Maclennan

    Around 50 people attended a briefing and question session at PJ Olivier High School with BJB Project Services. This is the company facilitating the application process for Atlas Towers to erect a 25-metre cellphone tower in what is currently the garden of the Dutch Reformed Church in Sunnyside.

    Many residents are furious at the plan, citing aesthetic, health and environmental concerns, as well as the fear that properties in the vicinity will lose value. In addition, the plans fall within the city’s historic buildings conservation area.

    Residents asked about the consultation process, saying many of the people directly affected hadn’t been notified of the company’s plans.

    While BJB representative Daniel Beukes wasn’t able to answer technical questions, such as the amount of radiation each of the three repeaters on the tower would emit, nor the contention ratio (the maximum number of users). However, he was clear on questions of process. This included the following information:

    • The application has received environmental and Civil Aviation Authority approval;
    • BJB is confident that they have taken every step in their application correctly, according to the legislated process;
    • That the industry standard for monthly rental to the host of a cellphone tower averages R3000 to R3500;
    • Objectors should not submit a petition because the Makana Council, whose job it is to approve the application, will consider it a single submission;
    • Should the Council approve the application, all objectors will be informed of this by means of a registered letter. Objectors may still appeal within 30 days;
    • Once the current contract ends (just short of 10 years) the mast will either be decommissioned and broken down, or a new contract will be drawn up.

    Four days after the meeting, Beukes was still not able to provide specific technical information requested at Tuesday’s meeting.

    Grocott’s Mail on Tuesday asked how much radiation each of the three repeaters on the tower would be emitting. Beukes said he would need to get a response to that question from Atlas Towers.

    On Friday 12 July, Grocott’s Mail spoke to Beukes, who said, “Unfortunately I have still not received that information from the company.” He wasn’t sure when he would receive it.

    The meeting was arranged and chaired by member of the council of the Dutch Reformed Church Joubert Retief, who ensured everyone had the chance to voice their opinion and ask questions. The deadline for objections to the plan for a cellphone tower on Erf 4102 is 15 July. The plans are available to view at the Makana Town Planning office in Joza.

    Meanwhile, Sunnyside resident Roddy Fox has since done research that shows around a third of Makhanda’s declared heritage sites are situated within a 250-metre radius of the planned cellphone tower.

    In his notes to a graphic he produced to illustrate this, he says, “There’s 23 in view on the pic and two more hidden (they are in the overlap of Sheblon Lane and Cross Street). There are only 70 heritage Sites in Grahamstown so this is a significant proportion.”

    Fox’s source was the website of the South African Heritage Resource Agency.

    According to research done by Sunnyside resident Roddy Fox, around a third of Makhanda’s declared heritage sites are situated within a 250-metre radius of the planned cellphone tower. He produced this graphic for illustration.

    https://www.grocotts.co.za/2019/07/05/residents-react-over-cellphone-tower-plan/

    https://www.grocotts.co.za/2019/11/12/how-risky-is-radiation-from-cellphones-and-towers/

    Previous ArticleMan’s body found in ditch
    Next Article One of Makhanda’s greatest assets
    Sue Maclennan
    • Twitter

    Local journalism

    Comments are closed.

    Code of Ethics and Conduct
    GROCOTT’S SUBSCRIPTION
    RMR
    Listen to RMR


    Humans of Makhanda

    Humans of Makhanda

    Weather    |     About     |     Advertise     |     Subscribe     |     Contact     |     Support Grocott’s Mail

    © 2025 Maintained by School of Journalism & Media Studies.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.