Grocott's Mail
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Monday, May 19
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Grocott's Mail
    • NEWS
      • Courts & Crime
      • Features
      • Politics
      • People
      • Health & Well-being
    • SPORT
      • News
      • Results
      • Sports Diary
      • Club Contacts
      • Columns
      • Sport Galleries
      • Sport Videos
    • OPINION
      • Election Connection
      • Makana Voices
      • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
      • Newtown… Old Eyes
      • Incisive View
      • Your Say
    • ARTSLIFE
      • Cue
        • Cue Archives
      • Makana Sharp!
      • Visual Art
      • Literature
      • Food
      • Festivals
      • Community Arts
      • Going Places
    • OUR TOWN
      • What’s on
      • Spiritual
      • Emergency & Well-being
      • Covid-19
      • Safety
      • Civic
      • Municipality
      • Weather
      • Properties
        • Grahamstown Properties
      • Your Town, Our Town
    • OUTSIDE
      • Enviro News
      • Gardening
      • Farming
      • Science
      • Conservation
      • Motoring
      • Pets/Animals
    • ECONOMIX
      • Business News
      • Entrepreneurship
      • Personal Finance
    • EDUCATION
      • Education NEWS
      • Education OUR TOWN
      • Education INFO
    • EDITORIAL
    Grocott's Mail
    You are at:Home»Uncategorized»‘Second transition’ is non-existent
    Uncategorized

    ‘Second transition’ is non-existent

    Grocott's MailBy Grocott's MailAugust 2, 2012No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    The Rhodes University Department of Political and International Studies hosted its 10th annual ‘teach-in’ on Thursday last week. Nontsikelelo Mpulo reports on the fourth of five lectures focusing on the so-called Second Transition.

    According to venerated political analyst, Professor Steven Friedman, South Africa is not in a second transition, because we haven’t actually seen the first one.

    The Rhodes University Department of Political and International Studies hosted its 10th annual ‘teach-in’ on Thursday last week. Nontsikelelo Mpulo reports on the fourth of five lectures focusing on the so-called Second Transition.

    According to venerated political analyst, Professor Steven Friedman, South Africa is not in a second transition, because we haven’t actually seen the first one.

    In his talk entitled, “The fault lies not in our transition but in ourselves: The second transition and the deflection of responsibility”, Friedman debunked the myth that our country is in a second transition, as the government failed to implement the first one after 1994.

    To make sense of the issues at hand, Friedman explained that the policy document tabled at the 53rd ANC National Conference in 2012 cannot not be read in isolation. It needs to be read in conjunction with the Minister of Finance’s budget speech, which he believes to be a far clearer statement of the government’s intentions.

    In his view, the government (and by implication the ANC) is facing a crisis of credibility, because people who usually supported them are no longer comfortable with the direction the party has taken. The solution, it seems, is the government's scramble to become far more aggressive in dealing with poverty and inequality.

    This was not particularly controversial, says Friedman, but the problem lies in the government’s stance on the functions of the state.

    He explained that the ANC-led government viewed the state as an instrument of government; “a machine that if you pressed all the right buttons, everything would work”.

    History of failure
    This was the approach that dominated government-thinking when it developed the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP). Friedman noted that although it was lauded at the time, the RDP was nevertheless a failure because the government did not ask the citizens of this country what they wanted.

    As a result, South Africa did not in fact experience a first transition. It was premature to begin talking about a second transition when there remain serious constraints on including the majority of South Africans in the broader economy.

    Recent service delivery protests were testament to this fact, and Friedman suggested that a more appropriate way to view a state is as a system of relationships rather than a machine.

    He added that a majority of those in government are aware that the instrumentalist view of the state is flawed; hence the dearth of concrete proposals in the Second Transition document.

    Friedman concluded, “Ultimately the state cannot govern unless it is in a relationship with social activists and is willing to engage in constructive negotiation with those who are trying to effect change.”

    Are we currently in a second transition?




    View results

    Free Questionnaires

    Previous ArticleTender tries and succeeds
    Next Article Teens warned against phone porn
    Grocott's Mail

      Comments are closed.

      Code of Ethics and Conduct
      GROCOTT’S SUBSCRIPTION
      RMR
      Listen to RMR


      Humans of Makhanda

      Humans of Makhanda

      Weather    |     About     |     Advertise     |     Subscribe     |     Contact     |     Support Grocott’s Mail

      © 2025 Maintained by School of Journalism & Media Studies.

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.