Grocott's Mail
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Tuesday, June 24
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Grocott's Mail
    • NEWS
      • Courts & Crime
      • Features
      • Politics
      • People
      • Health & Well-being
    • SPORT
      • News
      • Results
      • Sports Diary
      • Club Contacts
      • Columns
      • Sport Galleries
      • Sport Videos
    • OPINION
      • Election Connection
      • Makana Voices
      • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
      • Newtown… Old Eyes
      • Incisive View
      • Your Say
    • CUE
      • Cue Archives
    • ARTSLIFE
      • Makana Sharp!
      • Visual Art
      • Literature
      • Food
      • Festivals
      • Community Arts
      • Going Places
    • OUR TOWN
      • What’s on
      • Spiritual
      • Emergency & Well-being
      • Covid-19
      • Safety
      • Civic
      • Municipality
      • Weather
      • Properties
        • Grahamstown Properties
      • Your Town, Our Town
    • OUTSIDE
      • Enviro News
      • Gardening
      • Farming
      • Science
      • Conservation
      • Motoring
      • Pets/Animals
    • ECONOMIX
      • Business News
      • Entrepreneurship
      • Personal Finance
    • EDUCATION
      • Education NEWS
      • Education OUR TOWN
      • Education INFO
    • EDITORIAL
    Grocott's Mail
    You are at:Home»OUR TOWN»Municipality»The lowlights of Makana’s Auditor-General report
    Municipality

    The lowlights of Makana’s Auditor-General report

    Rod AmnerBy Rod AmnerJune 15, 2022Updated:June 15, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The South African Auditor-General, Tsakani Maluleke. Photo: Polity.org.za

    By ROD AMNER

    Twenty-five of SA’s 257 municipalities received a disclaimer audit opinion, Auditor-General (AG) Tsakani Maluleke said at a media briefing on Wednesday, 15 June.

    Makana Municipality is one of the 25, receiving its disclaimer for the third year running.

    A disclaimer is the worst result a municipality can receive from the AG, indicating that its financial statements have no value.

    “If you are unable to do the very basic thing of showing what you have done with public funds, it demonstrates that you have no commitment to living up to your moral obligation to serve as a steward,” Maluleke said.

    “It shows that you have absolutely no will to drive transparency and no interest in demonstrating accountability,”

    When a municipality receives a disclaimed opinion, its finances are so poorly managed that it cannot provide documentary evidence to support its financial statements. This means the Auditor-General cannot form an opinion on those statements.

    When a municipality receives an adverse opinion, it does not follow the correct rules and procedures and does not provide complete, accurate information to account for its spending.

    The AG said poor or non-existent record-keeping was again bedevilling many municipalities, who often employed expensive consultants to try to make sense of their financials. 

    Makana spent almost R1 million on consultants for “asset and expenditure management”. The reason cited for the hire of the consultants was “lack of skills”.

    The AG said consultants were often employed to do the “very basics,” such as VAT and tax returns, even though the municipalities have staff. The Chris Hani municipality in the Eastern Cape, for example, paid a consultant R34 million for VAT submissions.

    Makana’s newly-appointed Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Nomfundo Fetcha worked as CFO for the Chris Hani Municipality when it received a disclaimer report from the AG in 2019-20.

    Makana’s AG report

    Here is some more detail from Makana’s damning audit opinions taken from the 2020-21 Auditor-General’s report released on 15 June 2022:

    Audit outcomes
    2016-17QualifiedUnchanged
    2017-18QualifiedUnchanged
    2018-19DisclaimerRegressed
    2019-20DisclaimerUnchanged
    2020-21DisclaimerUnchanged

    Annual Financial Statements submitted by legislated date: No

    Good quality financial statements submitted for audit: No

    Financial statement qualification areas

    The Auditor-General raised findings in the following areas:

    • Property infrastructure plant and equipment
    • Non-current assets Investment property
    • Heritage assets
    • Receivables
    • Liabilities Payables accruals and borrowings
    • Provisions and guarantees
    • Other liabilities
    • Capital and Reserves
    • Cash flow statement
    • Accounting policies changes in estimates and errors
    • Contingent liabilities and commitments
    • Cut-off date: Other disclosures
    • Revenue from exchange transactions
    • Expenditure
    • Unauthorised expenditure
    • Irregular expenditure

    The vacancy rate in the finance unit: 17%

    Consultants

    Consultants used for financial report: Yes
    Consultant costs: R975 152
    Consultant services used for: Asset management, expenditure management legislation
    Reasons for using consultants: Lack of skills
    Reasons why consultants were ineffective: Lack of records and documents

    Performance report
    2020-212019-202018-192017-182016-17
    Submitted on timeYesYesYesYesYes
    UsefulNoNoNoNoNo
    ReliableNoNoYesNoNo
    Performance ReportYesYesYesYesYes
    Good QualityNoNoNoNoNo
    Compliance with legislation

    The Auditor-General raised findings in the following areas:

    • Procurement and contract management legislation
    • Prevention of irregular expenditure
    • Legislation on effecting consequences
    • Strategic planning and performance management legislation
    • Asset management legislation
    • Revenue management legislation
    • Material misstatement or limitations in submitted annual financial statements
    Supply chain management

    The Auditor-General raised findings in the following areas:

    • Competitive and unfair procurement
    • Irregular expenditure related to SCM
    Infrastructure maintenance

    Repairs and maintenance expenditure on infrastructure assets: R0

    Repairs and maintenance expenditure on infrastructure assets as a percentage of infrastructure assets: 0%

    Internal controls

    Internal control assessment: Intervention required

    Financial management controls

    Proper record-keeping: Intervention required

    Daily and monthly controls: Intervention required

    In-year and year-end reporting: Intervention required

    Review and monitor compliance: Intervention required

    Root causes

    Key officials lack appropriate competencies

    Slow responseNo Response
    Political leadershipNoNo
    ManagementYesNo
    OversightNoNo
    Municipal vacancies

    Overall municipal vacancies: 44%

    Previous ArticleJol’ inkomo! The Black Power Station honours Mama Afrika
    Next Article Diamonds on the soles of the sisters’ shoes
    Rod Amner
    • Website

    Comments are closed.

    Code of Ethics and Conduct
    GROCOTT’S SUBSCRIPTION
    RMR
    Listen to RMR


    Humans of Makhanda

    Humans of Makhanda

    Weather    |     About     |     Advertise     |     Subscribe     |     Contact     |     Support Grocott’s Mail

    © 2025 Maintained by School of Journalism & Media Studies.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.