Grocott's Mail
  • NEWS
    • Courts & Crime
    • Features
    • Politics
    • People
    • Health & Well-being
  • SPORT
    • News
    • Results
    • Sports Diary
    • Club Contacts
    • Columns
    • Sport Galleries
    • Sport Videos
  • OPINION
    • Election Connection
    • Makana Voices
    • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
    • Newtown… Old Eyes
    • Incisive View
    • Your Say
  • ARTSLIFE
    • Cue
    • Makana Sharp!
    • Visual Art
    • Literature
    • Food & Fun
    • Festivals
    • Community Arts
    • Going Places
  • OUR TOWN
    • What’s on
    • Spiritual
    • Emergency & Well-being
    • Safety
    • Civic
    • Municipality
    • Weather
    • Properties
      • Grahamstown Properties
    • Your Town, Our Town
  • OUTSIDE
    • Enviro News
    • Gardening
    • Farming
    • Science
    • Conservation
    • Motoring
    • Pets/Animals
  • ECONOMIX
    • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Personal Finance
  • EDUCATION
    • Education NEWS
    • Education OUR TOWN
    • Education INFO
  • Covid-19
  • EDITORIAL
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • In the words of Nelson Mandela, “To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity”
  • Flooding at the James Kleynhans Water Treatment Works
  • Avbob 2023 Poetry Competition Second Place: Jeannie Wallace McKeown
  • Avbob 2023 Poetry Competition Winner: Sithembele Isaac Xhegwana
  • Residents of Extensions Nine, 10, Transit Camp, Phumlani and Enkanini voice discontent!
  • Makhanda Creatives Speak Out
  • Running towards a drug and alcohol-free Makhanda
  • What’s On 23 – 30 March
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Grocott's Mail
  • NEWS
    • Courts & Crime
    • Features
    • Politics
    • People
    • Health & Well-being
  • SPORT
    • News
    • Results
    • Sports Diary
    • Club Contacts
    • Columns
    • Sport Galleries
    • Sport Videos
  • OPINION
    • Election Connection
    • Makana Voices
    • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
    • Newtown… Old Eyes
    • Incisive View
    • Your Say
  • ARTSLIFE
    • Cue
    • Makana Sharp!
    • Visual Art
    • Literature
    • Food & Fun
    • Festivals
    • Community Arts
    • Going Places
  • OUR TOWN
    • What’s on
    • Spiritual
    • Emergency & Well-being
    • Safety
    • Civic
    • Municipality
    • Weather
    • Properties
      • Grahamstown Properties
    • Your Town, Our Town
  • OUTSIDE
    • Enviro News
    • Gardening
    • Farming
    • Science
    • Conservation
    • Motoring
    • Pets/Animals
  • ECONOMIX
    • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Personal Finance
  • EDUCATION
    • Education NEWS
    • Education OUR TOWN
    • Education INFO
  • Covid-19
  • EDITORIAL
Grocott's Mail
You are at:Home»Uncategorized»Can your tweets get you sacked?
Uncategorized

Can your tweets get you sacked?

Grocott's MailBy Grocott's MailJanuary 26, 2016No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

South Africa has been beset by a number of social media storms in the first month of 2016, with employers increasingly being placed in the difficult position of having to decide whether or not to take action against employees for their behaviour online.

South Africa has been beset by a number of social media storms in the first month of 2016, with employers increasingly being placed in the difficult position of having to decide whether or not to take action against employees for their behaviour online.

Samiksha Singh, Director in the Employment Practice, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, says that in the employment context, while there are several cases which confirmed the fairness of dismissals of employees who made disparaging comments about their employers or colleagues on social media, the recent events raise the question as to whether an employee can be appropriately disciplined and possibly dismissed for making inappropriate remarks on social media even if the remark is not related to his or her employment.
Essentially, the question is whether inappropriate conduct on social media, which is not related to the employment of the author, constitutes misconduct outside the workplace.

According to Singh, it is highly likely that South Africa’s labour courts, in addition to following the UK case law on social media misconduct, will follow SA’s own case law in respect of misconduct committed outside the workplace.

The SA Labour Court recently upheld the dismissal of a senior employee for misconduct outside the workplace as his dishonest conduct was viewed as destructive to the heart of the employment relationship. And in the UK, the UK Employment Tribunal said there was no reason why an employer should treat misconduct arising from the misuse of social media in any way different to any other form of misconduct.

“In the age of social media, the line between business and personal interests is blurred and it has become increasingly important to evaluate the potential consequences – not only on your personal profile, but also on the profile of the brand, institution or company that you associate yourself with,” says Singh.

In his South African Social Media Landscape Report, 2014,  Arthur Goldstuck, states that: "Employees active in social media are becoming brand ambassadors for their respective brands, often outperforming the brands themselves on social media…"  

According to Singh, it is important to note that the “brand ambassadors” of a company are not confined to a list of the marketing and public relations employees of the company, but every employee of the company becomes a brand ambassador as they in some way or the other publicly display their association with the company.

For instance, employees who update their Facebook or LinkedIn profiles to indicate their employment with the company, display their association with and are brand ambassadors of the company much in the same manner as employees who deal directly with customers and the public as outlined in the course and scope of their employment.

The problem is that posts can be shared instantaneously and screen shots of posts are generally saved for future use. Therefore the ability to delete unsavoury posts and even the author’s account, does not create a guarantee that the actual post will be deleted from virtual or actual reality.

“The moment that a comment or remark is posted online, there is no turning back. So while employees should ensure they positively influence public perspective in order to take the brand of their employer forward, employers must take proactive steps to ensure that they are protected from any actual or potential reputational damage caused by inappropriate or unsavoury remarks made by their brand ambassadors,” says Singh.

She advises that employers should implement stringent social media policies that deal with all eventualities in relation online behaviour. It is no longer sufficient to deal only with workplace issues, as behaviour outside the workplace can have a negative impact on the employment relationship and has the ability to cause potential or actual reputational damage to the company.

Both Preeta Bhagattjee and Christoff Pienaar, Directors in the Technology Media and Telecoms Practice, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, agree that it is imperative that stringent social media policies are implemented in order to adequately cater for the era of advancing technology. In a time when online access is a simple tap on an icon on your smartphone, the regulation of the conduct of employees must also change drastically.

Previous ArticleHit your boxing deadline
Next Article Credit check your tenants- again
Grocott's Mail

Comments are closed.

Tweets by Grocotts
Newsletter



Listen

The Rhodes University Community Engagement Division has launched Engagement in Action, a new podcast which aims to bring to life some of the many ways in which the University interacts with communities around it. Check it out below.

Humans of Makhanda

Humans of Makhanda

Weather    |     About     |     Advertise     |     Subscribe     |     Contact     |     Support Grocott’s Mail

© 2023 Maintained by School of Journalism & Media Studies.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.