Grocott's Mail
  • NEWS
    • Courts & Crime
    • Features
    • Politics
    • People
    • Health & Well-being
  • SPORT
    • News
    • Results
    • Sports Diary
    • Club Contacts
    • Columns
    • Sport Galleries
    • Sport Videos
  • OPINION
    • Election Connection
    • Makana Voices
    • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
    • Newtown… Old Eyes
    • Incisive View
    • Your Say
  • ARTSLIFE
    • Makana Sharp!
    • Visual Art
    • Literature
    • Food & Fun
    • Festivals
    • Community Arts
    • Going Places
  • OUR TOWN
    • What’s on
    • Spiritual
    • Emergency & Well-being
    • Safety
    • Civic
    • Municipality
    • Weather
    • Properties
      • Grahamstown Properties
    • Your Town, Our Town
  • OUTSIDE
    • Enviro News
    • Gardening
    • Farming
    • Science
    • Conservation
    • Motoring
    • Pets/Animals
  • ECONOMIX
    • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Personal Finance
  • EDUCATION
    • Education NEWS
    • Education OUR TOWN
    • Education INFO
  • Covid-19
  • EDITORIAL
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • Get your passport blessed 
  • Yes, it changed us
  • The Enyobeni Tavern tragedy: lessons for our own municipality
  • The spirit of Africa in indigenous African instruments
  • A laugh a day keeps the end of fest blues away
  • The hole left by absent fathers
  • Festival Of Circles: a festival within a festival
  • The stunning story of an autistic, self-taught pianist
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Grocott's Mail
Cue Media
  • NEWS
    • Courts & Crime
    • Features
    • Politics
    • People
    • Health & Well-being
  • SPORT
    • News
    • Results
    • Sports Diary
    • Club Contacts
    • Columns
    • Sport Galleries
    • Sport Videos
  • OPINION
    • Election Connection
    • Makana Voices
    • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
    • Newtown… Old Eyes
    • Incisive View
    • Your Say
  • ARTSLIFE
    • Makana Sharp!
    • Visual Art
    • Literature
    • Food & Fun
    • Festivals
    • Community Arts
    • Going Places
  • OUR TOWN
    • What’s on
    • Spiritual
    • Emergency & Well-being
    • Safety
    • Civic
    • Municipality
    • Weather
    • Properties
      • Grahamstown Properties
    • Your Town, Our Town
  • OUTSIDE
    • Enviro News
    • Gardening
    • Farming
    • Science
    • Conservation
    • Motoring
    • Pets/Animals
  • ECONOMIX
    • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Personal Finance
  • EDUCATION
    • Education NEWS
    • Education OUR TOWN
    • Education INFO
  • Covid-19
  • EDITORIAL
Grocott's Mail
You are at:Home»Uncategorized»Bravo documentaries spark heated debate
Uncategorized

Bravo documentaries spark heated debate

_Gr0cCc0Tts_By _Gr0cCc0Tts_March 12, 2014Updated:April 26, 2017No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

The following statement has been released by Rhodes University's Prof Lynette Steenveld, Prof Robert Van Niekerk, Prof Larry Strelitz after a public viewing and discussion of the work of American documentary filmmaker, Estela Bravo, elicited much heated debate.

The following statement has been released by Rhodes University's Prof Lynette Steenveld, Prof Robert Van Niekerk, Prof Larry Strelitz after a public viewing and discussion of the work of American documentary filmmaker, Estela Bravo, elicited much heated debate.

The statement follows the publication of two opinion pieces in Grocott's Mail: one piece by Mark Woodland, a student who criticized Bravo during the discussion following a piece she did about Cuba, and a response by Esther Ramani defending Woodland's right to speak.

 

You can read the opinion pieces at the following links:

Opinion: Speaking out about Cuba

Opinion: Student braves Bravo

 

Bravo dissent misses the point: a response

Prof Lynette Steenveld, Prof Robert Van Niekerk, Prof Larry Strelitz

The 7 March edition of Grocott’s Mail contained two opinion pieces on the public viewing and discussion of two films by American documentary filmmaker, Estela Bravo held in the Barrett Lecture theatre. As organisers of the event, we wish to point out a couple of inaccuracies in the information conveyed about the event.

First, the event on the 26th February was not organised by the Politics Department, but was co-hosted by the School of Journalism & Media Studies, the International Office of Rhodes University, and the Institute of Social and Economic Research. It was chaired by Prof Lynette Steenveld, and the guest speaker was introduced by her. Ms Estela Bravo had no role in the introductions as erroneously stated in one of the opinion pieces .

Secondly, both opinion pieces claim that a student was “silenced” because he challenged Ms Bravo’s films as being excellent pieces of “propaganda” which did not portray “the truth” about Cuba (and also North Korea—it wasn’t clear how these links were made).

In our view, having been given the opportunity to make this point, which was an aggressive delivery of what appeared to be a prepared speech, Professor Steenveld held up her hand to stop his further haranguing in order to give other people the same opportunity as he had, to speak.

The microphone was then taken around the room, and Dr Ramani was allowed to make her ‘defence’ of the student’s right to free speech, and she commended his ‘bravery’ in speaking up in a context in which he appeared to hold a minority view.

And perhaps this is the point: he did appear to hold a minority view amongst those present. It is therefore surprising that the coverage of the occasion focused on this one contribution, rather than on the many others which occupied the rest of the evening.

For those who were not there, it might be noted that one young man from Pedi stood up and movingly described his stay in Cuba as a medical student; another recalled that his family came from a village near Cuite Cuenevale in Angola (where the Cubans scored a decisive victory against the Apartheid SADF) and what an impact that had made on his life.

Many students came up to Estela Bravo at the end of the film screening and asked to have their photographs taken with her.

These occurences, as well as the student responses to the films as they were being screened suggest that those present had been engaged in different ways.

In a University, this is the hoped for response: to make students think, and feel, and perhaps act differently as a result of their intellectual engagement. The ‘dissenting student’, Mark Woodland, was also offered this opportunity.

We also think that Estela Bravo’s documentaries were cast in a particular light in the two opinion pieces. Two documentaries were screened. Mandela and Fidel focused on what underpinned the friendship between the two political ‘giants’ in the context of Cuban support for the struggle against apartheid. The footage focused on both the personal and political aspects of their relationship—and offered touching moments of intimacy between the two leaders.

The second documentary, After the Battle, focused principally on the human effects of the Angolan battle of Cuite Cuenevale on the families of South African and Cuban soldiers who fought in the historic battle.

The documentary gave voice to the South African family view, as it did to the Cuban family view, while unambiguously taking the position that the SADF incursion into Angola was illegitimate and that the struggle against apartheid was a legitimate struggle.

Bravo portrayed the families of apartheid era SADF soldiers who died in the conflict very sensitively and demonstrated the tragic irony that despite many of the white conscripted soldiers being personally opposed to apartheid, they ended up dying as conscripts in Angola for a cause they did not believe in.

Although Bravo showed the overwhelmingly positive reception the Cuban soldiers received on returning to Havana from Angola, welcomed home as liberation fighters, she also gave space to a man who had not fought there, and did not believe that Cubans should have gone to fight in Angola. She allowed the soldiers and their families to give their views on why they were inspired to volunteer to fight with the Cuban forces in Angola.

Some made observations about their Cuban family histories being traceable to Angola through slavery, giving them an affinity with Angola and its people.

This documentary, first screened by the BBC in 1991, provoked animated discussion and questions to Estela Bravo by students after the screening.

That Mr Woodland considered the documentaries Cuban propaganda is but one view to which he is fully entitled; many thought and felt differently. Unfortunately the Grocott's Mail coverage failed to reflect this diversity of views.

Prof Lynette Steenveld
Prof Robert Van Niekerk
Prof Larry Strelitz
Previous ArticleAbsa Currie Cup 2014 fixtures announced
Next Article Ticking Idols off your bucket list
_Gr0cCc0Tts_

Related Posts

Johan Carinus tree planting

Learn music fit for a king

First place for Malawian journalist- Need to upload Pix

Comments are closed.

Cue for you!
Cue for you!
Cue for you!
Tweets by Grocotts
Newsletter



Listen

The Rhodes University Community Engagement Division has launched Engagement in Action, a new podcast which aims to bring to life some of the many ways in which the University interacts with communities around it. Check it out below.

Latest video

Weather    |     About     |     Advertise     |     Subscribe     |     Contact     |     Support Grocott’s Mail

© 2022 Maintained by School of Journalism & Media Studies.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.