Grocott's Mail
  • NEWS
    • Courts & Crime
    • Features
    • Politics
    • People
    • Health & Well-being
  • SPORT
    • News
    • Results
    • Sports Diary
    • Club Contacts
    • Columns
    • Sport Galleries
    • Sport Videos
  • OPINION
    • Election Connection
    • Makana Voices
    • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
    • Newtown… Old Eyes
    • Incisive View
    • Your Say
  • ARTSLIFE
    • Cue
    • Makana Sharp!
    • Visual Art
    • Literature
    • Food & Fun
    • Festivals
    • Community Arts
    • Going Places
  • OUR TOWN
    • What’s on
    • Spiritual
    • Emergency & Well-being
    • Safety
    • Civic
    • Municipality
    • Weather
    • Properties
      • Grahamstown Properties
    • Your Town, Our Town
  • OUTSIDE
    • Enviro News
    • Gardening
    • Farming
    • Science
    • Conservation
    • Motoring
    • Pets/Animals
  • ECONOMIX
    • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Personal Finance
  • EDUCATION
    • Education NEWS
    • Education OUR TOWN
    • Education INFO
  • Covid-19
  • EDITORIAL
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • Almost 50 GADRA alumni graduate from Rhodes this week!
  • How it feels to go without water for seven days
  • Cleaning Kowie River and Fairview Spring for World Water Day
  • Local soccer teams avoid SAB Regional League relegation!
  • Bongani Fule: new Eastern Cape Junior Lightweight champion!
  • Bathurst Book Fair is back with a bang!
  • In the words of Nelson Mandela, “To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity”
  • Avbob 2023 Poetry Competition Winner: Sithembele Isaac Xhegwana of Makhanda
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Grocott's Mail
  • NEWS
    • Courts & Crime
    • Features
    • Politics
    • People
    • Health & Well-being
  • SPORT
    • News
    • Results
    • Sports Diary
    • Club Contacts
    • Columns
    • Sport Galleries
    • Sport Videos
  • OPINION
    • Election Connection
    • Makana Voices
    • Deur ‘n Gekleurde Bril
    • Newtown… Old Eyes
    • Incisive View
    • Your Say
  • ARTSLIFE
    • Cue
    • Makana Sharp!
    • Visual Art
    • Literature
    • Food & Fun
    • Festivals
    • Community Arts
    • Going Places
  • OUR TOWN
    • What’s on
    • Spiritual
    • Emergency & Well-being
    • Safety
    • Civic
    • Municipality
    • Weather
    • Properties
      • Grahamstown Properties
    • Your Town, Our Town
  • OUTSIDE
    • Enviro News
    • Gardening
    • Farming
    • Science
    • Conservation
    • Motoring
    • Pets/Animals
  • ECONOMIX
    • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Personal Finance
  • EDUCATION
    • Education NEWS
    • Education OUR TOWN
    • Education INFO
  • Covid-19
  • EDITORIAL
Grocott's Mail
You are at:Home»Uncategorized»How many wives do you need – the debate
Uncategorized

How many wives do you need – the debate

Busisiwe HohoBy Busisiwe HohoFebruary 25, 2010No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

The Eden Grove Blue lecture theatre was jam-packed with students and learners from Kingswood College and Victoria Girls’ High when the Rhodes Debating Society held its Xxxhibition debate.

The Eden Grove Blue lecture theatre was jam-packed with students and learners from Kingswood College and Victoria Girls’ High when the Rhodes Debating Society held its Xxxhibition debate.

The Xxxhibition debate is a tradition and is held every year to expose students interested in debating to the British parliamentary style and to encourage students to join the society, says chairperson Kabwela Chisaka.

Ingrid Cloete and  Clive Eley opened the debate. Cloete, ‘the prime minister’, argued that today’s customary law, which makes polygamous marriages legal, is there to protect women’s rights.

She said that in the past, women who were second or third wives were not recognised as such when the husband died, and were therefore often left without a home or much support.

Cloete argued that polygamy reinforces patriarchy and causes a  breakdown in the equality and dignity of women who must then compete for a man.

At this point, Chisaka, the deputy leader of the opposition, leaped out of her seat proclaiming that women compete for men all the time, to which Cloete replied “I’ve never had to compete for a man.”

Michelle Beukes, the leader of the opposition, opposed the motion and asked why Zuma should be the only Zulu in the country not allowed to exercise his cultural right to polygamy.

“Whether or not we think he’s a horrible person he is doing nothing against the law,” she said. Deputy prime minister Eley weighed up the values and harms of polygamy to people and to society.

He challenged Beukes’ claim to cultural relativism and said that the president is different,because society holds him to a higher moral standard than any other person. Eley said that Zuma’s  polygamy, as shown in the media, is not representative of polygamy in South Africa.

At this point Chisaka was itching to take to the podium. She questioned Eley’s western notion of polygamy as she says that women in traditional polygamous marriages are not meant to feel interior or superior to the other wives, instead, it provides a network of wives to call upon and to stabilise the household.

She added that people in South Africa should be allowed to make their own choices. James Ekron defended the motion in the second half of the debate.

He argued that Zuma is undermining culture by making a spectacle of it and making it difficult for
others to practice polygamy.

He said Zuma’s approach is anything but traditional, as “he has been  exonerated for rape, engaged in extra-marital affairs and impregnated women before (or if at all) he has married them.”

Customary law and Zulu culture require that families meet and talk first before a marriage is approved, but Zuma “believeshe may take a woman as he wants”.

Ekron concluded his argumrent by  saying that nothing is beyond the scrutiny of public debate, especially not the presidency.

At this stage the closing opposition was bristling with indignation. Egmont Bouwer contested Ekron’s condemnation of Zuma’s extramarital affairs, and proclaimed “pomping is not polygamy”.

Bouwer also questioned the“false dichotomy” of being totally Zulu or totally western. He argued that culture is fluid and that monogamy, which has become such a natural institution, is not “the be-all and end-all” of society.

“In monogamy youwrap the bride in a white dress and pay her a diamond ring for her virginity,” he declared provocatively.

Dylan Smith wrapped up the government’s side of the debate by saying Zuma’s polygamy is damaging South
Africa’s image of the world.

The final word came from Lwamba Chisaka who asserted that the defenders of the motion had failed to prove that the effects of polygamy on Zuma’s wives were negative.

She insistedthat Zuma’s extramarital affairs and dubious moral choices are not reasons to condemn his lifestyle, which was the nature of the debate.

After a rapid fire of questions that left the debaters drained and longing for the free pizza and wine served outside, the winners were announced.

Beukes and Chisaka  were the winners  with Ekron and Smith following hot on their heels in second place. Cloete and Eley were in third place and Bouwer and Lwamba Chisaka ranked in fourth place.

Previous ArticleViv’s variety concert sizzles
Next Article Transforming townships is Mafcoc’s goal
Busisiwe Hoho

Comments are closed.

Tweets by Grocotts
Newsletter



Listen

The Rhodes University Community Engagement Division has launched Engagement in Action, a new podcast which aims to bring to life some of the many ways in which the University interacts with communities around it. Check it out below.

Humans of Makhanda

Humans of Makhanda

Weather    |     About     |     Advertise     |     Subscribe     |     Contact     |     Support Grocott’s Mail

© 2023 Maintained by School of Journalism & Media Studies.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.